After so many Bosnian Muslims continuosly support and join ISIS and other similar organizations, i.e. Muslim brotherhood, Jabhat al Nusra, many (mostly American and Western in general) nations seemed sursprised.
How, on Earth, one so great nation that has been supported, a new nation that enjoyed every possible aid from the West, turned to be so hateful towards those who were ready to kill Christians in the middle of Europe in order to support them?
Only those naive and kept in dark by mainstream media could be surprised. Neither Bosnian muslims were the victims, nor Bosnian war was a fight for freedom nor against some Serbian aggression as it has been media – portrayed for decades.
The basic fact of just what caused the conflict in ex – Yugoslavia are, still, not presented to the general public in the West.
To understand Bosnian muslims one had to know their self proclaimed leader, ”president of Bosnia” – Alija Izetbegovic.
Disbelief in the West regarding Muslim fundamentalism in Bosnia stems from several causes, among which there is a pervasive, compulsive, complacency which holds that things can never be as bad as they seem, hence European officialdom refused to believe that Hitler meant what he wrote in Mein Kampf.
President Alija Izetbegovic’s Islamic Declaration, first published in 1970 when it earned him a prison sentence, demanded a fully-fundamentalist Muslim state in Bosnia without scope for non-Muslim institutions or any division between religion, politics, and economics. The book was republished in 1990 in Sarajevo (by Mala Muslimanska Biblioteka). It scathingly attacks Attaturk’s reforms and holds up Pakistan as a model to be followed.
Bosnian politician Semsudin Mehmedovic with Serbian head
Traditionally, Bosnians were among the most militant in the Muslim world. A ruling minority, they were proud of being the spearhead of the jihad into Europe, part of the two-pronged drive along Sava and Danube with Rome as its final objective. Occupation by the Habsburgs in 1878 caused some of them to emigrate, but others waited for fate to redeem them.
Excerpts from issue of IAA entitled “MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALISM IN BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA” published in 1992:
There is a great reluctance in the West to recognize that the fighting in Bosnia is a resurgence of the conflict between Islam and Christendom which shaped five centuries of Balkan history.
But the story goes on. Only fifty years ago Serbs were subject to a genocide in Bosnia. The geographic district, under Nazi occupation, was part of Nazi Independent State of Croatia…
For decades Encyclopedia Britannica had the following sentence when talking about WWII in Yugoslavia: “…IN BOSNIA… THE CROATIAN FASCISTS BEGAN A MASSACRE OF SERBS WHICH, IN THE WHOLE ANNALS OF WORLD WAR II, WAS SURPASSED FOR SAVAGERY ONLY BY THE MASS EXTERMINATION OF POLISH JEWS”!!!!!!!!
BosnianMuslim SS Handzar salutes mufti Al Husseini
One can find the above sentence in all versions of Britannica from at least 1971 till 1987.
And who joined Nazi Croats in slaughtering the Serbs? You’ve guessed it: The Muslims!
Today, Muslims and Croats – united in hatred of Serbs, are once again at task of slaughtering Serbs. Having no knowledge of the history of the region, and having no sence of shame, “democratic” West is supporting the union (and the slaughter).
MR. IZETBEGOVIC’S MEIN KAMPF
Western media presents him as a ‘secular’ President, but… It is not without reason that Mr. Izetbegovic got the highest praise from Islam Fundamentalist leaders of the world for SPREAD OF ISLAM.
THE PRESIDENT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA MR. ALIJA IZETBEGOVIC WAS ISLAM FUNDAMENTALIST
It is up to you to find eventual differences between Mr Izetbegovic’s capital work and Ayatollah Khomeyni’s speeches. I do not see any…
The following are excerpts from the book “The Islamic Declaration” (“Islamska deklaracija”), written by Mr. Alija Izetbegovic, current President of Bosnia-Herzegovina. The book was reprinted by “BOSNA”, Sarajevo, 1990, 127 pages.
“… Do we want the Muslim nations to cease moving in circles, to stop being dependent, backward and poverty-stricken;
do we want them to once again with a sure step climb the road of dignity and enlightment and to become masters of their own fate;
do we want the springs of courage, genius and virtue to come forth strongly once again;
then we must show the way which leads to that objective:
The implementation of Islam in all fields of individuals’ personal lives, in family and in society, by renewal of the Islamic religious thought and creating a uniform Muslim community from Morocco to Indonesia. ...“
“… A nation, and an individual, who has accepted Islam is incapable of living and dying for another ideal after that fact. It is unthinkable for a Muslim to sacrifice himself for any tzar or ruler, no matter what his name may be, or for the glory of any nation, party or some such, because acting on the strongest Muslim instinct he recognizes in this a certain type of godlessness and idolatry. A Muslim can die only with the name of Allah on his lips and for the glory of Islam, or he may run away from the battlefield. …“
“… Muslim nations will never accept anything that is explicitly against Islam, because Islam here is not merely a faith and the law, Islam has become love and compassion. He who rises against Islam will reap nothing but hate and resistance. …”
“… In perspective, there is but one way out in sight: creation and gathering of a new intelligence which thinks and feels along Islamic lines. This intelligence would then raise the flag of the Islamic order and together with the Muslim masses embark into action to implement this order. …”
“… The shortest definition of the Islamic order defines it as a unity of faith and law, upbringing and force, ideals and interests, spiritual community and state, free will andforce. As a synthesis of these components, the Islamic order has two fundamental premises: an Islamic society and Islamic authority. The former is the essence, and the latter the form of an Islamic order. An Islamic society without Islamic power is incomplete and weak; Islamic power without an Islamic society is either a utopia or violence.
A Muslim generally does not exist as an individual. If he wishes to live and survive as a Muslim, he must create an environment, a community, an order. He must change the world or be changed himself. History knows of no true Islamic movement which was not at the same time a political movement as well. This is because Islam is a faith, but also a philosophy, a set of moral codes, an order of things, a style, an atmosphere – in a nutshell, an integral way of life. …”
“… The first and foremost of such conclusions is surely the one on the incompatibility of Islam and non-Islamic systems. There can be no peace or coexistence between the “Islamic faith” and non- Islamic societies and political institutions. …Islam clearly excludes the right and possibility of activity of any strange ideology on its own turf.
” Islam contains the principle of ummet, i.e. the tendency towards unification of all Muslims into a single community – a spiritual, cultural and political community. Islam is not a nationality, it is above nationalities. …”
“… The upbringing of the nation, and especially the mass media – the press, TV and film – should be in the hands of people whose Islamic moral and intellectual authority is undisputed. …
… Islamic renewal cannot be initiated without a religious, and cannot be successfully continued and concluded without a political revolution.”
“… Establishing of an Islamic order is thus shown as the ultimate act of democracy,because it means the implementation of the deepest desires of the Muslim nations and common man. One thing is certain: no matter what a part of the rich and the intelligence wants, the common man wants Islam and living in his Islamic community. …”
“… In the struggle for an Islamic order all methods are permitted, except one – except crime. No-one has the right to smear the beautiful name of Islam and this struggle by uncontrolled and excessive use of violence. …”
“… Islamic order may be implemented only in countries where Muslims represent the majority of the population. Without this majority, the Islamic order is reduced to authority only (because the other element is lacking – the Islamic society), and may turn into violence. …”
“… the Islamic movement should and must start taking over the power as soon as it is morally and numerically strong enough to not only overthrow the existing non-Islamic, but also to build up a new Islamic authority. …”
“… Pakistan was a general rehearsal of introducing Islamic order under modern conditions and on the present stage of development. …
… The conclusions from the twenty-odd year of Pakistan’s existence are clear enough. They are:
First, the struggle for Islamic order and a general reconstruction of the Muslim society can be successfully conducted only by experienced and seasoned individuals, aligned into a staunch and homogenous organization. This organization is no political party from the arsenal of the Western democracy; it is a movement based on Islamic ideology and with clear moral and ideological criteria of belonging;
Second, the struggle for an Islamic order today is a struggle to implement the essence of Islam, and this means that in practice one must ensure religious and moral upbringing of the people and provide for basic elements of social justice. At this time, forms are of secondary importance; and
Third, the functions of the Islamic republic are not to primarily declare equality of all men and brotherhood of all Muslims, but to struggle for some of these high moral principles in practice. The awakened Islam should in every community take into its own hands the flag for a more just social order and to clearly state that in struggling for Islam another war is being declared as well, the one against ignorance, injustice and poverty, a war without compromises and setbacks. …”
“… In one of the thesis for an Islamic order today we have stated that it is a natural function of the Islamic order to gather all Muslims and Muslim communities throughout the world into one. Under present conditions, this desire means a struggle for creating a great Islamic federation from Morocco to Indonesia, from the tropical Africa to the Central Asia. …”
“… Panislamism always came from the very heart of the Muslim peoples, nationalism was always imported stuff. …”
“… This politics in Palestine is a provocation to all Muslims of the world. Jerusalem is not only a question of Palestinians, neither is it a question of Arabs only. It is a question of all the Muslim nations. TO KEEP JERUSALEM, THE JEWS WOULD HAVE TO DEFEAT ISLAM AND THE MUSLIMS, AND THAT – THANK GOD – IS OUTSIDE THEIR POWER.”
FOR ALL MUSLIMS THERE IS BUT ONE SOLUTION: TO CONTINUE TO FIGHT, TO STRENGTHEN AND BROADEN IT, FROM DAY TO DAY, FROM YEAR TO YEAR, NO MATTER THE VICTIMS AND NO MATTER THE TIME ….
— END —
- British: “The daily telegraph” May 11, 1992: “Conflict could lay foundations for Islamic state in Europe”
- Canadian: “Globe and Mail” October 17, 1992, page A10: “Media reports from Bosnia: A mixture of Outright lies, Staged events and untold stories”.
- “Jerusalem Post”, August 11, 1993, text by Yohanan Ramati, Director of the Jerusalem Institute for Western Defence: “Don’t cry for Bosnian Moslems”
- British: “Sunday Times”, August 30, 1992 , page A1: “Arabs join in Bosnia battle”
- American: “Newsweek”, October 5, 1992, page 52: “Help from holy warriors (Inside a secret military camp: how mujahedin fighters are training Bosnia’s muslims”
- “The European”, february 4, 1993: “How Iran is arming Bosnia’s Muslims”
- London: Times, October 21, 1994: “Disciples of holy war answer call to fight and die (The presence of Mujahedin fighters from around the world on Bosnian batterfields is unnerving the West)”
- Washington Times, June 2, 1994, page 1: “Iranians move into Bosnia to terrorize Serbs”
- Washington Post, May 13, 1994: “Iran ships material for arms to Bosnians”
TOO LITTLE AND TOO LATE. NATO bombed Christian children Bosnia 1995, Serbia 1999) in order to help Islam Fundamentalist and get a stronghold in the heart of Europe… Serbs were expelled from Sarajevo, city they founded more than thousand years ago!
Who was Alija Izetbegovic?
Moderate ‘George Washington’ of Bosnia or Islamist Murderer?
“A Coincidence of Obituaries”
by Jared Israel
Quotations from Alija Izetbegovic’s Islamic Declaration
Translated by Petar Makara
Bosnian Leader Hails Islam at Election Rallies”
by Chris Hedges
N.Y. Times, 2 September 1996